How to fill the teapot with another 50% of the blank branches?

[小饰X]

Hello, Edward！！！

I'm just giving  an example，The teapot may be a flower or a fruit！

I created two path position distributor on the same parent path，The first one on the left, I set the count rate to 50%，My idea is to fill the teapot with another 50% blank branches, so that I can edit all their parameters separately，However, when I set the count rate of the second distributor on the right to 50%，The filled teapot is a random position，It is not to fill the other 50% blank branches，You can see that I changed the position of the teapot of the second distributor, some of which are overlapped with the teapot of the first distributor，I have tried many methods, but they can't solve this problem!

 

What's the best way?

[Eduard]

Hello 小饰X,

 

You can use this solution for your task:

 

 

I didn't use a Switch node between the 2 Distributors nodes because the Random node won't be calculated properly there. Instead, it will always return one value, since the creation of distribution sequences is performed before the generation of any pathlines, so we can't get the chaos we need.

 

If you need to get a distribution of 20/80%, then you can create a scheme like this:

(This is another example with different objects)

 

Thanks!

 

[小饰X]

8 小时前，Eduard 说：

 

Hello 小饰X,

 

You can use this solution for your task:

 

 

I didn't use a Switch node between the 2 Distributors nodes because the Random node won't be calculated properly there. Instead, it will always return one value, since the creation of distribution sequences is performed before the generation of any pathlines, so we can't get the chaos we need.

 

If you need to get a distribution of 20/80%, then you can create a scheme like this:

(This is another example with different objects)

 

Thanks!

 

Thanks, Edward, this is one way! But I prefer that the switch node can be executed between distributor. According to your method, I will not be able to control the parameters of the distributor independently, because they are communal!

Edited November 29, 2022 by 小饰X

[小饰X]

3 hours ago, 小饰X said:

Thanks, Edward, this is one way! But I prefer that the switch node can be executed between distributor. According to your method, I will not be able to control the parameters of the distributor independently, because they are communal!

 

[sanitaro25]

interesting information